BIA Holds That Where A Notice To Appear Fails To Specify The Time Or Place Of A Respondent’s Initial Removal Hearing, The Subsequent Service Of A Notice Of Hearing Specifying… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That  §58-37-8(2)(a)(i) Of The Utah Code, Which Criminalizes Possession Or Use Of A Controlled Substance, Is Divisible With Respect To The Identity Of The Specific “Controlled Substance” Involved… CONTINUE

Acting Attorney General Holds That Matter Of A-B-, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018), Did Not Alter The Existing Standard For Determining Whether A Government Is “Unwilling Or Unable” To… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That An Immigration Judge May Find A Document To Be Fraudulent Without Forensic Analysis Or Other Expert Testimony Where The Document Contains Obvious Defects Or Readily Identifiable Hallmarks… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That The Risk Of Harm To A Child Required To Obtain A Conviction For Child Neglect In The Second Degree Under §163.54(1) Of the Oregon Revised Statutes Is… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That Expert Testimony is Evidence, But Only An Immigration Judge Makes Factual Findings. When The Immigration Judge Makes A Factual Finding That Is Not Consistent With An Expert’s… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That Where One Who Was Previously Present In The U.S. Without Being Admitted Or Parole Has His Or Her Temporary Protected Status (TPS) Terminated, He Or She Remains… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That Attorney’s Acceptance Of Responsibility For Error Does Not Discharge The Disciplinary Authority Complaint Obligation Under Matter Of Lozada, 19 I&N Dec. 637 (BIA 1988), Particularly Where The… CONTINUE