• Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Hearings & Appeals
    • Deportation, Removal & Asylum
    • Family Immigration
    • Marriage
    • Employment Visa
    • H-1B Work Visas
    • E-1 & E-2 Visas
    • Labor Certifications
    • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
  • Attorneys
    • Philip M. Levin, Managing Partner
    • Don L. Pangilinan, Associate
    • Saja A. Raoof, Of Counsel
    • Alec P. Wilczynski, Of Counsel
    • Scott A. Wilkinson, Associate
    • Ana Gandara, Of Counsel
    • Cara Cox, Associate
    • Sharon Evans, Of Counsel
  • Blog
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us

Philip Levin & Associates

Immigration Law

¿Necesitas el sitio web en español?

800.974.2691 
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Hearings & Appeals
    • Deportation, Removal & Asylum
    • Family Immigration
    • Marriage
    • Employment Visa
    • H-1B Work Visas
    • E-1 & E-2 Visas
    • Labor Certifications
    • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
  • Attorneys
    • Philip M. Levin, Managing Partner
    • Don L. Pangilinan, Associate
    • Saja A. Raoof, Of Counsel
    • Alec P. Wilczynski, Of Counsel
    • Scott A. Wilkinson, Associate
    • Ana Gandara, Of Counsel
    • Cara Cox, Associate
    • Sharon Evans, Of Counsel
  • Blog
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us

BIA Holds That INA §240A(c)(6) Bars One Who Has Previously Been Granted Special Rule Cancellation Of Removal Under The Nicaraguan Adjustment And Central American Relief Act From Applying For Cancellation Of Removal Under INA §240A(a) Or (b)(1).

December 23, 2021 Philip Levin & Associates

On August 10, 2021, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) dismissed Respondent’s appeal for the 2nd time; in March 2015 it had dismissed Respondent’s appeal of an order by the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying her application for cancelation of removal per INA §240A(a). The instant decision came on remand from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. 

The decision first stated that the dispositive issue before the BIA was whether Respondent’s prior grant of special rule cancelation of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment And Central American Relief Act (NACARA) bars her, per INA §240A(c)(6), from applying for cancellation of removal under INA §240A(a). This question of law was reviewed de novo. 

After being granted special rule cancellation, Respondent had been placed into removal proceedings, where she applied for cancelation per INA §240A(a), The Board initially noted that §240A(c)(6) provides that one whose removal has previously been cancelled under 240A(a) “is statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal under section 240(a) or (b)(1) of the Act.” Thus, the “plain language ” of §240A(b)(6) precludes her from obtaining §240A(a) cancellation. The opinion therefore held that, based on the plain language of §203(b) of the NACARA (the enabling section which allows the Attorney General, under INA 240A, to cancel the removal of an eligible applicant.) and INA §240A(c)(6) as amended by the NACARA, 240A(c)(6) bars one who has previously been granted special rule cancellation under the NACRA from applying for cancellation under §240A(a) or (b)(1). The rest of the opinion is a justification for its decision under the Ninth Circuit remand. 

Initially, stated the BIA it “respectfully recognize[d]” that the court of appeals had held in its remand order that it is ambiguous whether Congress intended §240A(c)(6) to extend to NACARA §203 recipients. Thus, concluded the opinion, where the controlling circuit holds that the language of the statute is ambiguous in this respect, basic rules of statutory construction led the Board to alternatively conclude that Congress intended a grant of special rule cancellation under the NACARA to bar, per §240A(c)(6), a future grant of cancellation under §240A(a) or (b)(1). First, Congress had “explicitly exempted” NACARA applicants from the annual cap on the numbers of applicants for cancellation and suspension of deportation that can be granted in a single fiscal year; obviously, Congress knew how to explicitly exempt those who previously received special rule cancellation under NACARA from specific provisions of §240A. The decision  found it significant that Congress chose not to explicitly exempt NARACA recipients from the bar to relief found at §240A(c)(6); this omission, it concluded, supports its decision that “Congress did not intend to exempt such recipients from this statutory bar.” 

https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1422976/download

Secondly the BIA found that the language of §203(b) of the NACARA revealed that where Congress intended to make specific provisions of §240A inapplicable to special rule cancellation under the NACARA, it did so explicitly; the implementing regulations support this conclusion. Specifically, stated the decision, 8 C.F.R. §1240. 66(a) provides that, to establish special rule cancellation eligibility under NACARA, an applicant must prove that he or she is not subject to any bars in §§240(b)(7), 240A(c) or 240B(d). Further, an applicant for cancellation per §240A(a) or (b)(1) must prove that he or she is not barred by §240A(c)(6) “based on a prior grant of NACARA special rule cancellation of removal.” The Board thus concluded that Respondent’s prior receipt of special rule cancellation under the NACARA bars her, per §240A(c)(6), from applying for cancellations under §240A(a). The appeal was dismissed. Matter of Hernandez-Romero, 28 I&N, Dec. 374 (BIA 2021). 

Filed Under: Blog

Contact Us

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Blog Posts

  • BIA Holds That A “Conviction” Under INA…
  • BIA Holds That Larceny In The Third Degree Under Connecticut General Statutes
  • BIA Issues Amicus Invitation
  • What is a U Visa Work Permit?
  • BIA: RAISES THE MANDATORY BAR FOR FILING

Practice Areas

  • Family Immigration
  • Marriage
  • Employment Visa
  • H-1B Work Visas
  • PERM Labor Certification
  • E-1 & E-2 Visas
  • Hearing & Appeals
  • Deportation, Removal, Asylum
  • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
San Francisco Main Office
930 Montgomery Street
Suite 502
San Francisco, CA 94133
       

San Francisco Main Office
930 Montgomery Street
Suite 502
San Francisco, CA 94133

Silicon Valley Office
5201 Great America Parkway
Suite 320
Santa Clara, CA 95054

Silicon Valley Office
5201 Great America Parkway
Suite 320
Santa Clara, CA 95054

North Bay Office
4040 Civic Center Drive
Suite 200
San Rafael, CA 94903

North Bay Office
4040 Civic Center Drive
Suite 200
San Rafael, CA 94903

Santa Barbara Office
3463 State Street
Suite 516
Santa Barbara, CA 93105
Los Angeles Office
445 S. Figueroa Street
Suites 2600 & 2700
Los Angeles, CA 90071
©2022 Philip Levin & Associates, Prof. Corp. All Rights Reserved.
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Employment Visa
  • Family Visas
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Practice Areas
    • Deportation, Removal, Asylum
    • E-1 Visas & E-2 Visas
    • Employment Visa
    • Family Immigration
    • H-1B Work Visas
    • Hearings & Appeals
    • I-9/Worksite Enforcement
    • Marriage Immigration Lawyers
    • Perm Labor Certification

Copyright © 2022 · XML Sitemap · Sitemap

R-1
TN

The TN nonimmigrant classification allows qualified Canadian and Mexican citizens to enter the U.S. and engage in professional business activities. PL&A will help you navigate through the TN application process by evaluating your eligibility, preparing supporting documentation for your application, and ultimately filing your application. 

B-1

PL&A will guide you through the consular process to receive a B-1 visa for specific short-term business purposes ranging from contract negotiations to seminars and conferences.

O-1

O-1 visas are for persons of extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business or sports. 

J-1

Administered by the Department of State, the J-1 visa is for students, trainees, academics, researchers, professionals or experts participating in an approved Exchange Visitor program. PL&A will assist you and your sponsor with preparing the necessary paperwork and the consular process so you can begin your program at ease. 

E-1 & E-2

E-1 visas and E-2 visas are for nationals of countries with which the United States has a treaty of friendship, commerce and navigation (FCN) or bilateral investment treaty (BIT). If you are a nonimmigrant trader or investor seeking to conduct business operations or develop a new enterprise in the U.S., we will help you file for the appropriate visa. As a recognized expert in this area, Mr. Levin will provide experienced and dependable assistance with E-1 or E-2 visa applications. 

  • E-1: If you are a national of a country that conducts a significant volume of trade with the U.S. (or if you intend to develop trade between the U.S. and your home country) you might be eligible for entry under an E-1 visa. 
  • E-2: The E-2 visa allows investors from treaty countries to enter the U.S. for purposes of directing and developing a business, with all the commitments and risks implicit in entrepreneurial activity. 
L-1

The L-1 visa category is for executives, managers or professionals employed by foreign affiliates of U.S companies. The L-1 visa is divided into two classifications:

  • L-1A Intracompany Transferee Executive or Manager
  • L-1B Intracompany Transferee Specialized Knowledge
H-1B

Many companies in the United States find themselves increasingly dependent on the talent, experience and energy of foreign national workers in professional, technical or specialized occupational fields. These employees typically enter the U.S. on nonimmigrant H-1B visas for “specialty occupations.” 

With extensive experience in business immigration, you can count on PL&A to guide your company or Human Resources department in preparing and filing an H-1B visa petition.

Green Card

Family preservation and reunification is a priority for our firm. Our attorneys have advised and assisted families from all over the world with entry visas, adjustment of status, and other immigration problems. 

  • Immediate Relatives: If you are the spouse, child, or parent of a U.S. citizen, we can help you obtain a green card through an Immediate Relative petition. 
  • Family-Based Preference: If your relative is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, we can assist you with your green card application through one of the family based preference categories.
Fiances

If you are a U.S. citizen and your fiancé/fiancée or spouse is overseas, our office will assist you to navigate the CIS requirements and regulations to have the case approved and then prepare you and your spouse for the interview at the U.S. Embassy. PL&A will also help you find the best ways to resolve any problems you encounter if a waiver is required in your case.

Marriage

Immigration through marriage is a common means of obtaining permanent residence in the U.S.  Since 1991, Philip Levin & Associates has helped hundreds of couples immigrate to the U.S. and build their lives together. 

  • I-130 Petition and Adjustment of Status: If you are married to a U.S. citizen, present in the U.S. and eligible to do so, our attorneys will assist you in preparing and filing the necessary I-130 petition and I-485 adjustment of status application in the U.S.
  • Immigrant Visa Consular Processing: If you are married to a U.S. citizen and reside abroad, we will assist you in preparing and filing the IV petition with an Embassy or Consulate-General in your native country. 
  • I-751, Remove Conditions on Residence: If you have been married less than two years at the time your green card was initially approved, our office will help you in the joint petition process to become a permanent resident.