BIA Holds That Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105 (2018) And Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021) Are Inapplicable To Proceedings Initiated By A Notice To Applicant… CONTINUE
Understanding BIA Ruling on Noncitizen Inadmissibility Periods INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)
BIA Holds That Noncitizens Who Are Inadmissible For A Specified Period Of Time Pursuant To INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i), Due To Their Previous Unlawful Presence And Departure, Are Not Required To… CONTINUE
BIA Ruling on Objections in Motion to Reopen & Niz-Chavez Impact
BIA Holds That A Respondent Who Raises An Objection To Missing Time Or Place Information In A Notice To Appear For The First Time In A Motion To Reopen Has… CONTINUE
BIA Ruling on Controlled Substance Violation & Categorical Approach
BIA Holds That Any Fact That Establishes Or Increases The Permissible Range Of Punishment For A Criminal Offense Is An “Element” For Purposes Of The Categorical Approach, Even If The… CONTINUE
Bia Holds That In Determining Whether A Respondent Is Grandfathered For Purposes Of Adjustment Of Status Under INA §245(i)
Bia Holds That In Determining Whether A Respondent Is Grandfathered For Purposes Of Adjustment Of Status Under INA §245(i), A Decision By USCIS To Approve A Visa Petition Filed On… CONTINUE
BIA Holds No Prima Facie Case for Fourth Amendment Violation in Barcenas Matter – A Legal Analysis
BIA Holds That Where An Immigration Judge Finds That A Traffic Stop Was Nothing More Than A Routine Law Enforcement Action, A Respondent Has Not Established A Prima Facie Case… CONTINUE
BIA Determines Fraud Waiver Cannot Waive Removability under INA §237(a)(1)(D)(i)
BIA Holds That A Fraud Waiver Under INA§237(a)(1)(H) Does Not Waive A Respondent’s Removability Under INA §(a)(1)(D)(i), Where Conditional Permanent Residence Was Terminated For Failure To File A Joint Petition,… CONTINUE
BIA Holds Deferred Adjudication Satisfies Conviction for Particularly Serious Crime Bar under INA § 241(b)(3)(B)(ii)
BIA Holds That A Respondent Who Is Subject To A Deferred Adjudication That Satisfies The Elements Of §§ 101(a)(48)(A)(i) And (ii) Has Been “Convicted By A Final Judgement” Within The… CONTINUE
BIA Holds That “Stop-Time” Rule Is Not Triggered By Final Order of Removal
BIA Holds That The “Stop-Time” Rule Under INA §240A(d)(1) Is Not Triggered By The Entry Of A Final Order of Removal, But Rather Only By Service Of A Statutorily Compliant… CONTINUE
BIA Holds That A Conviction For Second Degree Burglary Of A Dwelling Under New York Penal Law §140.25(2) Is Categorically A Conviction For Generic Burglary…
BIA Holds That A Conviction For Second Degree Burglary Of A Dwelling Under New York Penal Law §140.25(2) Is Categorically A Conviction For Generic Burglary Under INA §101(a)(43)(G) Because The… CONTINUE
- « Previous Page
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- …
- 12
- Next Page »