San Francisco Immigration Lawyers

BIA Holds That The Offense Of Making Terroristic Threats In Violation Of Section 609.713, Subdivision 1, Of The Minnesota Statutes Is Categorically A Crime Involving Moral Turpitude

February 10, 2020 Philip Levin

On January 2, 2020, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) sustained a DHS appeal and remanded the record to the Immigration Judge (IJ), who had found Respondent removable… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That An Immigration Judge May Rely On Inconsistencies To Support An Adverse Credibility Finding As Long As Either The Immigration Judge, The Applicant, Or The DHS Has Identified The Discrepancies And The Applicant Has Been Given An Opportunity To Explain Them During The Hearing. An Immigration Judge May, But Is Not Required To, Personally Identify An Obvious Inconsistency Where It Is Reasonable To Assume That The Applicant Was Aware Of It And Had An Opportunity To Offer An Explanation Before The Immigration Judge Relied On It.

January 29, 2020 Philip Levin

On December 12, 2019, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) denied the Respondent’s request for oral argument and dismissed his appeal of an order by the Immigration Judge… CONTINUE

H-1B CAP-SUBJECT PETITION REGISTRATION PROCESS

January 6, 2020 Philip Levin, Don L. Pangilinan and Scott A. Wilkinson

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) has announced implementation of an online registration process for the upcoming FY2021 H-1B lottery, applicable to all new* cap-subject H-1B petitions. Employer Petitioners seeking… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That Torturous Conduct Committed By A Public Official Who Acts “In An Official Capacity,” That Is, “Under Color Of Law,” Is Covered By The Convention Against Torture, But Such Conduct By An Official Who Is Not Acting In An Official Capacity, Known As A “Rogue Official,” Is Not Covered By The Convention. The Key Consideration In Determining If A Public Official Was Acting Under Color Of Law Is Whether He Was Able To Engage In Torturous Conduct Because Of His Government Position Or If He Could Have Done So Without A Connection To The Government.

January 6, 2020 Philip Levin

On December 6, 2019, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) in a lengthy and extensively footnoted decision, dismissed the appeal of a respondent whose applications for political asylum,… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That The Reopening Of Proceedings To Terminate A Grant Of Asylum Is Warranted If DHS Has Demonstrated That Evidence Of Fraud In The Original Proceeding Was Not Previously Available And Is Material Because, If Known, It Would Likely Have Opened Up Lines Of Inquiry That Could Call An Applicant’s Eligibility For Asylum Into Doubt.

January 3, 2020 Philip Levin

On November 8, 2019, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) sustained a DHS appeal, reopened removal proceedings and remanded the record to the Immigration Judge (IJ) so that… CONTINUE

BIA Requests Amicus Curiae Briefs

December 31, 2019 Philip Levin

On November 6, 2019, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) issued an amicus invitation welcoming parties to brief whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Esquirel-Quintana v. Sessions,… CONTINUE

BIA Requests Amicus Curiae Briefs

December 31, 2019 Philip Levin

On November 5, 2019, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) issued an amicus invitation welcoming interested parties to brief whether an Immigration Judge errs in terminating proceedings when… CONTINUE

BIA Holds That To Qualify For A Waiver Of Inadmissibility Under INA §209(c), One Who Is Found To Be A Violent Or Dangerous Individual Must Establish Extraordinary Circumstances, Which May Be Demonstrated By A Showing Of Exceptional And Extremely Unusual Hardship To The Applicant Or His Qualifying Relatives. Matter of Jean, 23 I&N Dec. 373 (A.G. 2002) Followed. Even If One Establishes This Level Of Hardship, The Favorable And Adverse Factors Must Be Balanced To Determine If A Waiver Should Be Granted In The Exercise Of Discretion.

December 31, 2019 Philip Levin

On November 1, 2019, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) sustained the DHS appeal of a grant of Respondent’s application for an INA §209(c) waiver of inadmissibility and… CONTINUE

Attorney General Barr Holds That The Tests Set Forth in Matter of Cota Vargas, Matter of Song And Matter of Estrada Will No Longer Govern The Effect Of State Court Orders That Modify, Clarify Or Otherwise Alter A Criminal Respondent’s Sentence. Such State Court Orders Will Be Given Effect For Immigration Purposes Only If Based On A Procedural Or Substantive Defect In The Underlying Criminal Proceeding; These Orders Will Have Effect For Immigration Purposes If Based On Reasons Unrelated To The Merits Of The Underlying Criminal Proceeding, Such As Rehabilitation Or The Avoidance Of Immigration Consequences.

December 31, 2019 Philip Levin

On October 25, 2019, Attorney General (AG) William Barr issued a decision in a case which he had, on May 28, 2019, directed the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or… CONTINUE

Attorney General Barr Holds That The Immigration And Nationality Act’s “Good Moral Character” Standard Requires Adherence To The Generally Accepted Moral Conventions Of The Community And That Criminal Activity Is Probative Of Non-Adherence To Such Conventions. Therefore, Evidence Of Two Or More Convictions For Driving Under The Influence During The Relevant Period Establishes A Presumption That One Lacks Good Moral Character Under INA §101(f). Because Only Those Who Possess Good Moral Character For A 10-Year Period Are Eligible For Cancellation Of Removal Per INA §240A(b), Such Evidence Presumptively Establishes That One’s Application For That Discretionary Relief Should Be Denied.

December 31, 2019 Philip Levin

On October 25, 2019, Attorney General (AG) William Barr issued a decision in a case previously decided by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board). On December 3, 2018,… CONTINUE